(323) 254-1510

Pennsylvania Supreme Court Decides That Workers’ Compensation Exclusion In Underinsured Motorist Policy Is Void – Plaintiff May Recover UIM Benefits

By admin on October 29, 2011

pIn an important decision for many workers involved in Pennsylvania car accidents with an underinsured party, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court reversed a ruling of the Appellate Court striking down an exclusion on a car insurance policy which claimed that if an individual received workman’s compensation benefits, he was not eligible for a href="http://www.reiffandbily.com/lawyer-attorney-1391763.html"underinsured motorist benefits/a. The facts of the case revealed that a police officer in the course and scope of his employment was injured in an a href="http://www.reiffandbily.com/lawyer-attorney-1315525.html"automobile accident/a with a minimally insured driver and sustained severe injuries. Workers’ compensation paid the plaintiff’s medical expenses and two-thirds of his salary. The injured police officer recovered $25,000 policy limits from the third party insurance carrier, Allstate, (the insurance company responsible for the accident), however, due to the fact that losses and d [...]

Read the Rest of "Pennsylvania Supreme Court Decides That Workers’ Compensation Exclusion In Underinsured Motorist Policy Is Void – Plaintiff May Recover UIM Benefits"

Leave a Reply:

Name (required):
E-Mail (required):
Website:

Comment:


Call us at (323) 254-1510 or fill
out the contact form below and
we will get back to you shortly.

Name
Phone:
E-mail:
Website:
Questions:

Anti-spam question:

SLS News Join Us on Facebook How To Make the Most of the Internet For Solo and Small Firms Better Business Bureau - Reliability Report for Sipe & Associates